← Back to today's reads

Strategy Β· Thursday, August 27 Β· 6 min read

The math behind bet sizing, written for someone who has done it wrong

Most sharp/square divides come down to staking discipline, not edge. Two players with the same picks and different size strategies end the year on different planets.

Kelly is the academic answer; half-Kelly is the practical one. Full Kelly maximizes long-run growth but expects you to estimate edge precisely. Nobody does. Half-Kelly cuts variance roughly in quarters with only a small hit to growth β€” and forgives the error in your edge estimate that you cannot remove.

The two destructive habits: flat-staking on every pick regardless of edge, and freerolling on a streak. Flat-staking treats a 3% edge and a 0.5% edge identically. Freerolling spends an opening run before the model has even sampled enough trials to know whether you have an edge at all. Discipline is small. The damage of skipping it is not.

More from today

NHL5 min

Goalie carousel: how three starters changed this week's totals

Halle Okafor

Pro wrestling5 min

Storyline reads: how this week's go-home show is shaping the title picture

Marcus Hale

Soccer5 min

European weekend: the matches the model can't decide on

Della Quinn