← Back to today's reads

Strategy Β· Friday, August 7 Β· 6 min read

The math behind bet sizing, written for someone who has done it wrong

Most sharp/square divides come down to staking discipline, not edge. Two players with the same picks and different size strategies end the year on different planets.

Kelly is the academic answer; half-Kelly is the practical one. Full Kelly maximizes long-run growth but expects you to estimate edge precisely. Nobody does. Half-Kelly cuts variance roughly in quarters with only a small hit to growth β€” and forgives the error in your edge estimate that you cannot remove.

The two destructive habits: flat-staking on every pick regardless of edge, and freerolling on a streak. Flat-staking treats a 3% edge and a 0.5% edge identically. Freerolling spends an opening run before the model has even sampled enough trials to know whether you have an edge at all. Discipline is small. The damage of skipping it is not.

More from today

Soccer5 min

European weekend: the matches the model can't decide on

Sasha Reyes

Tennis5 min

Surface shift: who the seeds protect and who suddenly looks beatable

Cooper Voss

NBA5 min

Back-to-back fatigue and the spreads that quietly punish it

Avery Lin