← Back to today's reads

Strategy Β· Thursday, July 30 Β· 6 min read

The math behind bet sizing, written for someone who has done it wrong

Most sharp/square divides come down to staking discipline, not edge. Two players with the same picks and different size strategies end the year on different planets.

Kelly is the academic answer; half-Kelly is the practical one. Full Kelly maximizes long-run growth but expects you to estimate edge precisely. Nobody does. Half-Kelly cuts variance roughly in quarters with only a small hit to growth β€” and forgives the error in your edge estimate that you cannot remove.

The two destructive habits: flat-staking on every pick regardless of edge, and freerolling on a streak. Flat-staking treats a 3% edge and a 0.5% edge identically. Freerolling spends an opening run before the model has even sampled enough trials to know whether you have an edge at all. Discipline is small. The damage of skipping it is not.

More from today

UFC5 min

Main-card reads: which prices the market is mispricing tonight

Iris Donnelly

PGA5 min

Course fit reading: who history likes at this week's stop

Wes Calloway

MLB5 min

Probable pitchers reshaping the moneylines this week

Priya Kanth